DISCLOSURE:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission at no extra cost to you. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network, Amazon and Alibris.
To beat the market you'll have to invest serious bucks to dig up information no one else has yet.
ISBN10: 0275984273, ISBN13: 9780275984274, [publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing USA] Hardcover Former library book; may include library markings. Used book that is in clean, average condition without any missing pages. [Mishawaka, IN, U.S.A.] [Publication Year: 2005]
ISBN10: 0275984273, ISBN13: 9780275984274, [publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing USA] Hardcover Former library book; may include library markings. Used book that is in clean, average condition without any missing pages. [Mishawaka, IN, U.S.A.] [Publication Year: 2005]
ABC-CLIO, LLC. Used - Good. Former library book; may include library markings. Used book that is in clean, average condition without any missing pages. ABC-CLIO, LLC ISBN 0275984273 9780275984274 [US]
ISBN10: 0275984273, ISBN13: 9780275984274, [publisher: Bloomsbury Academic] Hardcover What happens when two deeply held American values, freedom of expression and freedom from discrimination, clash? In any well-established democratic society, people have the right to free speech as well as the right to equal treatment and protection under the law. But when one person's speech harms another person on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or sexual orientation, it may qualify as hate speech and be subject to restriction. Cortese argues that restricting hate speech does not violate the guiding principle behind the First Amendment, but he is not eager to see more lawsuits. Effective restriction, he asserts, should not focus on litigation but on speech codes and moral education.Is there a limit to freedom of expression in a democracy, and if so, where should the line be drawn? In attempting to answer that question, Cortese makes a solid case for paying attention to context and common sense. Some hate speech is more reprehensible than others; not all discriminatory statements are equally serious. There is a discernible difference between an offensive remark and an incitement to commit murder. There is also a fundamental distinction between intentional and unintentional discrimination. In this book, Cortese rethinks some of the issues that have been silenced in ways harmful to many-especially those that have been brutalized, oppressed, manipulated, dominat ...
Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, Date: 2006. A Fine unmarked copy with near Fine dustjacket. xvii + 229 pages. Professor Cortese traverses the terrain between the First and Fourteenth Amendments with skill and precision. His discussion takes the seam between freedom of expression and equal protection apart thread by thread, uncovering bias in the application of First Amendment rights which society should do well to acknowledge and rectify. 11. First Edition. Hard Cover. Fine/Near Fine. 8vo - over 7¾" - 9¾" tall. 2006. Praeger ISBN 0275984273 9780275984274 [GB]
ISBN10: 0275984273, ISBN13: 9780275984274, [publisher: Praeger, Westport, Connecticut] Hardcover First Edition A Fine unmarked copy with near Fine dustjacket. xvii + 229 pages. Professor Cortese traverses the terrain between the First and Fourteenth Amendments with skill and precision. His discussion takes the seam between freedom of expression and equal protection apart thread by thread, uncovering bias in the application of First Amendment rights which society should do well to acknowledge and rectify. 11 Size: 8vo - over 7¾" - 9¾" tall [Eastbourne, United Kingdom] [Publication Year: 2006]
ISBN10: 0275984273, ISBN13: 9780275984274, [publisher: Bloomsbury Academic] Hardcover What happens when two deeply held American values, freedom of expression and freedom from discrimination, clash? In any well-established democratic society, people have the right to free speech as well as the right to equal treatment and protection under the law. But when one person's speech harms another person on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or sexual orientation, it may qualify as hate speech and be subject to restriction. Cortese argues that restricting hate speech does not violate the guiding principle behind the First Amendment, but he is not eager to see more lawsuits. Effective restriction, he asserts, should not focus on litigation but on speech codes and moral education.Is there a limit to freedom of expression in a democracy, and if so, where should the line be drawn? In attempting to answer that question, Cortese makes a solid case for paying attention to context and common sense. Some hate speech is more reprehensible than others; not all discriminatory statements are equally serious. There is a discernible difference between an offensive remark and an incitement to commit murder. There is also a fundamental distinction between intentional and unintentional discrimination. In this book, Cortese rethinks some of the issues that have been silenced in ways harmful to many-especially those that have been brutalized, oppressed, manipulated, dominat ...
ISBN10: 0275984273, ISBN13: 9780275984274, [publisher: Praeger] Hardcover Book is in Used-Good condition. Pages and cover are clean and intact. Used items may not include supplementary materials such as CDs or access codes. May show signs of minor shelf wear and contain limited notes and highlighting. 1.1 [Hawthorne, CA, U.S.A.] [Publication Year: 2005]
Bloomsbury USA 3pl 11/30/2005 12: 00: 00 AM Hardcover PLEASE NOTE, WE DO NOT SHIP TO DENMARK. New Book. Shipped from UK in 4 to 14 days. Established seller since 2000. Please note we cannot offer an expedited shipping service from the UK.
ISBN10: 0275984273, ISBN13: 9780275984274, [publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, Westport] Hardcover Hardcover. What happens when two deeply held American values, freedom of expression and freedom from discrimination, clash? In any well-established democratic society, people have the right to free speech as well as the right to equal treatment and protection under the law. But when one person's speech harms another person on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or sexual orientation, it may qualify as hate speech and be subject to restriction. Cortese argues that restricting hate speech does not violate the guiding principle behind the First Amendment, but he is not eager to see more lawsuits. Effective restriction, he asserts, should not focus on litigation but on speech codes and moral education.Is there a limit to freedom of expression in a democracy, and if so, where should the line be drawn? In attempting to answer that question, Cortese makes a solid case for paying attention to context and common sense. Some hate speech is more reprehensible than others; not all discriminatory statements are equally serious. There is a discernible difference between an offensive remark and an incitement to commit murder. There is also a fundamental distinction between intentional and unintentional discrimination. In this book, Cortese rethinks some of the issues that have been silenced in ways harmful to manyespecially those that have been brutalized, oppressed ...
Hardback. New. We must push for moral education, educational speech codes, and when necessary, a formal, legal-structural response to hate speech in order to reinforce our commitment to tolerance as a value. ISBN 0275984273 9780275984274 [GB]
ISBN10: 0275984273, ISBN13: 9780275984274, [publisher: Bloomsbury 3PL] Hardcover nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - What happens when two deeply held American values, freedom of expression and freedom from discrimination, clash In any well-established democratic society, people have the right to free speech as well as the right to equal treatment and protection under the law. But when one person's speech harms another person on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or sexual orientation, it may qualify as hate speech and be subject to restriction. Cortese argues that restricting hate speech does not violate the guiding principle behind the First Amendment, but he is not eager to see more lawsuits. Effective restriction, he asserts, should not focus on litigation but on speech codes and moral education.Is there a limit to freedom of expression in a democracy, and if so, where should the line be drawn In attempting to answer that question, Cortese makes a solid case for paying attention to context and common sense. Some hate speech is more reprehensible than others; not all discriminatory statements are equally serious. There is a discernible difference between an offensive remark and an incitement to commit murder. There is also a fundamental distinction between intentional and unintentional discrimination. In this book, Cortese rethinks some of the issues that have been silenced in ways harmful to many-especially those that ...
DISCLOSURE:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission at no extra cost to you. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network, Amazon and Alibris.
